Saturday, 15 December 2018

Comments on the peer groups' pitches


The “Machine learning for traffic” -group’s pitch was successful. The speaker had a calm way of speaking, and the use of voice was good. The presentation had a fine structure, and the speaker also used some humour as a device. However, the message was a bit unclear since still after the pitch I wasn’t sure what the main point of the project is. Fortunately, I wasn’t the only one and that was covered with an answer to a question afterwards.

The “Makerspoint Oy” -group’s pitch was compact and informative. It was easy to understand, the structure was clear, and the project even had a workable slogan. The speaker spoke loud enough, but in my opinion, a bit slower pace would have brought even more value to the presentation.

Overall, it seemed like the both groups had put some effort into the task. Good job!

No comments:

Post a Comment